Potential Fields


 

Other Topics: Magnetic Field over north-central BC

 

Gravity Field over North-Central British Columbia

 

        This image (Figure 1) of the gravity field over north-central British Columbia was generated from 1625 individual gravity measurements acquired by the Geological Survey of Canada. Typically, measurements were spaced 10 km apart, although, closer spaced measurements (~2-3 km apart) were obtained along some highways and along a northeast-trending profile that crosses the northern portion of the Bowser Basin (see Lowe et al., 1992 for details). The data are considered accurate to ± 1 mGal.

 

Figure 1.  Gravity Anomaly Map of north-central BC

 

        The northwest-oriented structural grain of the this region is well reflected in observed gravity data. Gravity values decrease by more than 100 mGal from the southwestern to the northeastern part of the map area and distinct northwest-trending Bouguer anomaly lows are associated with the Hogem (HB) and Cassiar (CB) batholiths in the northeastern map area and with thick sedimentary accumulations in the Sustut Basin. Although the amplitude of the gravity field varies considerably over the Bowser Basin, here too gravity values are considerably lower than observed to the west, south, and north of the basin where volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks in the Stikine Terrane are exposed.

        Lowe et al. (2004) conducted several hundred density determinations on rock samples from the region. Analysis of these density data reveals: a) minimal spatial variation in the density of the Bowser Lake Group; and b) no difference in the average density of the Bowser Lake Group and the underlying Hazelton Group (see Tables 1 and 2 below). The observations imply that much of the northeasterly decrease in gravity observed across the Bowser Basin must be attributed to lateral density contrasts in pre-Hazelton rocks.

Table 1: Density of geologic units in the overlap assemblages.

Geologic unit

Density (kg/m3)

# samples

mean

range

Quaternary volcanics

2785

2750-2820

2

Maitland volcanics

2652

2330-2870

5

Sustut Group
    Tango Creek Formation
    Brothers Peak Formation

2561
2579
2481

2170-2750
2170-2750
2270-2610

65
53
12

Bowser Lake Group

2611

1880-3400

311

all units

2604

1800-3400

383

Sustut and Bowser Lake Groups

2603

1800-3400

376

Table 2: Density of geologic units in Stikinia.

Geologic unit

Density (kg/m3)

# samples

mean

range

Hazelton Group
    Spatsizi Formation
    Cold Fish volcanics
    undiff. Lower-Lower Middle Jurassic rocks
    undiff. volcanics Lower-Lower Middle Jurassic age

2611
2578
2642
2608
2630

2210-2970 
2410-2770
2440-2970
2410-2700
2210-2760

134
59
54
8
12

undiff. Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic rocks

2678

2420-2980

45

Stikine Assemblage

2811

2680-3070

7

all units

2635

2210-3270

186

        In general, observed gravity values are lower over the Sustut Basin compared to the Bowser Basin. This is consistent with the density information which indicates that the mean density of the Sustut Group is 50 kg/m3 lower than that of the Bowser Lake Group.

        Several short-wavelength, low amplitude anomalies are observed throughout the map area, many of which correspond with small granitic intrusions (outlined in white on gravity image). Despite their relatively high densities, the Maitland and younger volcanic rocks that overlie the Bowser Lake Group (outlined in grey on gravity image) do not generate positive anomalies because of their small spatial extents. Steep, linear gravity gradients parallel several mapped faults, including the Pelly, Swannell and Kutcho faults (east of the Sustut Basin), indicating lateral contrasts in density (lithology) and/or unit thicknesses across the faults.

 

Other Topics: Magnetic Field over north-central BC